This mock really showed me the value of picking battles. Tried to do everything in RC and ended up messing up the easier VA questions. Next time I’ll reverse my approach, VA first, then only the RCs that feel readable. The summary and sentence placement ones are genuinely scoring!

Finally a VARC section that rewards reading stamina! The Van Gogh and monarchy RCs felt like a breeze. Skipped the Christianity passage after 2 mins, it was just too abstract. Started with VA and I think that saved my section. Ended up attempting 20, with decent accuracy. Happy with the strategy this time.

I attempted 14 in VARC with decent accuracy, 2 sets in DILR (one fully correct, one partial), and 9 in QA focusing only on Arithmetic/Algebra. Strategy paid off. This mock really reinforced that identifying the right sets/questions is everything. Also, I like how the analysis clearly labels must-solve vs trap questions.

QA was brutal. Geometry was a graveyard! I marked all 5 but now I realize I should not have touched them. Only questions 8 and 11 felt solvable. From now on, I am going to prioritize Arithmetic and only attempt Geo if it’s from Mensuration or looks visually easy.

I only got 4 questions right across all 3 sections. Got trapped in tough RCs, could not crack any DILR set, and wasted time in Geometry in QA. This analysis helped me see how much I need to work on selection and skipping. Gotta stop panicking and slow down during mocks.

After two bad mocks, this one felt like progress. Managed to complete the Distribution Grid and 3 VA questions I felt confident about. Still missed the easy Quant questions though. Gonna print out the “must-solve” question numbers from every mock and build a tracker.

That DILR was a nightmare. Picked the Table Arrangement set first and got totally stuck. Lost 18 minutes and had to rush through everything else. In hindsight, should have started with the Distribution Grid or Tournament set. Definitely need to work on identifying the ‘trap’ sets early.