MBAGeeks Forum

CAT2026

14 hours ago

Which CAT Mock Series Is Actually Worth Your Money?

Body

Every year around August, I get some version of the same message. Someone's finished the syllabus, has three months left, and wants to know which mock series to buy. There isn't a clean one-word answer, so here's the version I actually give people.

Start with what a mock series is supposed to do for you

A good series does four things. It matches the real CAT interface closely enough that exam day doesn't feel unfamiliar. It has enough test takers that your percentile actually means something. Its solutions teach you the fast way to solve a question, not just the answer. And its analytics tell you something you can act on, not just a number to feel good or bad about.

The big names, honestly

TIME has run AIMCAT since 1992 and has one of the largest test-taking pools around, so the percentile holds up. What it doesn't do is walk you through your mistakes, the feedback mostly stops at a scorecard. IMS goes back to 1977 and runs a solid schedule, though the platform feels a little behind compared to newer apps. Career Launcher packs a lot in, full length tests, sectional tests, topic tests, but once you're at a busy centre the batches get big enough that the feedback loses any personal touch. 2IIM writes thorough explanations, but the smaller pool means the percentile isn't something to fully trust. Cracku is the budget pick, and it reads exactly like one, the difficulty doesn't track the real exam closely enough to calibrate against.

The one that actually explains your mistakes

CATKing does something the bigger names mostly skip, which is pair every mock with an actual person walking you through it. The mocks release in waves, so the difficulty ramps up through your prep instead of hitting you with the hardest questions before you're ready. Each mock gets reviewed by an IIM alumnus, so a wrong answer comes with someone explaining exactly where the time went, not an auto generated chart. One student put it simply: the mocks were calibrated to actual exam difficulty, and the wave format kept them improving week after week. There's a free full length mock too, CAT Before CAT, built for anyone who hasn't committed to a paid series yet. One student used it early, caught a weak spot in VARC accuracy, fixed it, and went from 82 percentile in mocks to 97 on the real exam. And for the students already close, chasing 99 plus, there's a separate track built for exactly that gap, because a student two points from an IIM call needs a very different kind of feedback than someone still building fundamentals.

What I'd actually tell you to do

If all you want is a trustworthy percentile, TIME or IMS gets you there. If DILR is your weak section specifically, Career Launcher's sectional tests are worth a look. If you want more written depth, 2IIM does that reasonably well. But if you're early in your prep, or you've been taking mocks without anyone explaining where you're actually losing marks, start with CAT Before CAT for free, then decide. A lot of serious aspirants end up running two series anyway, a big pool one for the raw number, and something more mentor-led like CATKing for the actual improvement in between.

Either way, the series matters less than what you do after the mock ends. Look at your accuracy by question type before you even check the percentile, split your mistakes into careless errors, concept gaps, and time pressure skips, and fix one thing properly before your next attempt instead of reviewing everything at once and forgetting half of it by morning.

ย 

Create custom feed

Make private

Communities (Select a community to add to your custom feed).