hey guys, can you tell how to do the analysis of mock? Like should I solve each and every question even if attempted or not? What should be my approach?

RC 11 was definitely tougher than RC 10. The VARC section felt more balanced in terms of readability , all passages were moderate difficulty, which was a relief after the previous mock's difficult passages. But the questions were trickier, especially 4, 5, 10, 22, and 24. I could only confidently solve the 3 easy ones. The consistent moderate readability helped with time management, but the question complexity caught me off guard. Need to work on inference-based questions.

The 'Moderate to Difficult' overall rating was spot on - this was definitely harder than RC 10. What killed me was the distribution of easy questions: only 3 in VARC, 1 in LRDI, and 3 in QA. That's just 7 easy questions across 68! I spent the first hour trying to solve everything and realized I was making silly mistakes on even the moderate questions due to time pressure. In my next attempt, I'll focus on identifying and solving these 7 questions first, then tackle moderate ones strategically.

LRDI section was my worst nightmare! Only ONE easy question (17) out of 20 like seriously?! Set 1 was absolutely brutal, and even the 'easy to moderate' Set 2 had tricky elements. I ended up spending 45 minutes on LRDI and could barely solve 8-9 questions confidently. The reduction from 22 to 20 questions didn't help when the difficulty was this high. I think I need to completely revamp my LRDI strategy - maybe focus on just 2-3 sets and do them perfectly. 

Honestly, this mock felt more like a grind than a test. The difficulty was spiked just enough to leave you drained by the end. 

Passage 2’s questions were so vague. Even after reading twice, I couldn’t figure out what they wanted with those inferencing questions.

I actually enjoyed Set 3 in DILR. It was logical and had just enough complexity to keep me interested without wasting time.

The Algebra and Geometry questions were brutal. I wasted a lot of time and ended up panicking halfway through QA. Set 1 was a nightmare. I shouldn't have touched it. Got stuck in the first few constraints and couldn’t get out.

QA was tough overall, but I found a couple of sitters early on like Q4 and Q5. Helped me gain some momentum. This mock was well-balanced. It wasn't easy, but if you stayed disciplined, you could definitely score well. A good simulation of real CAT.

I felt this mock really rewarded good selection. If you filtered smartly in Quant and VARC, you could walk away with solid attempts.